Medical Marijuana: Pros & Cons of Budding Legalization - The UMHS Endeavour

Up to Date Medical News and Views from The University of Medicine and Health Sciences, St. Kitts 

Facebook Twitter Gplus Pinterest YouTube E-mail RSS
Home Medical Marijuana Medical Marijuana: Pros & Cons of Budding Legalization
formats

Medical Marijuana: Pros & Cons of Budding Legalization

UP IN SMOKE? Criminalization of marijuana is becoming a thing of the past. Photo: FreeDigitalPhotos.ent

UP IN SMOKE? Criminalization of marijuana is becoming a thing of the past. Photo: FreeDigitalPhotos.ent

Medical marijuana is a divisive issue, but recent passages of laws in 21 states and the District of Columbia show it is inevitable that “pot” will eventually become legal in all 50 states for either medical or recreational use. Medical marijuana has been legal in California since 1996, while Colorado and Washington State recently legalized it for non-medical use. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed an executive order this week, making small amounts of medical marijuana legal in New York State without the need for a public referendum.

Although marijuana is technically an illegal drug under federal law, the Huffington Post reported that the U.S. Justice Department will not challenge state legalization laws “as long as they don’t conflict with eight federal enforcement priorities,” such as no pot to minors, trafficking the drug and “funneling marijuana revenue to gangs and cartels.” (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/01/06/marijuana-legal-states-medical-recreational/4343199/)

The UMHS Pulse looks at medical marijuana from scientific, medical and economic perspectives.

WHAT'S IN YOUR WEED? Patients need to know what is in the medical marijuana they have been prescribed, particularly if they have been diagnosed with a serious disease .Photo: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

WHAT’S IN YOUR WEED? Patients need to know what is in the medical marijuana they have been prescribed, particularly if they have been diagnosed with a serious disease .Photo: FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Scientific and Medical Views

Medical marijuana can be beneficial to people suffering from glaucoma, HIV, cancer, epilepsy and various illnesses. However, different types of marijuana are needed to properly treat patients depending on their ailment.

Earlier this week, USA Today reported that medical marijuana dispensaries and patients are turning to laboratories to evaluate the effectiveness of cannabis plants (http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/06/medical-marijuana-purity-laboratories/4336123/) and “identify potentially harmful substances and pinpoint the potency of plants and cannabis-infused products, from caramels and ‘cherry roll’ candies to butter.”

Such states as Illinois and Massachusetts have mandatory lab testing of medical marijuana. USA Today spoke to Steve Cottrell of AZ Medical Testing in Phoenix about the need to test marijuana for medical use. Mr. Cottrell said marijuana “should be tested for mold, bacteria and fungus, which can weaken patients’ respiratory systems.” His company tests for “active cannabinoids — including CBDs, CBG, THC and THCA — the chemicals responsible for many of the physical and psychological effects of marijuana.”

Patients need to know what is in the medical marijuana they have been prescribed, particularly if they have been diagnosed with cancer or HIV.

“Patients with a compromised immune system, this can further their ailment and make it more dangerous for them to consume the medicine,” Mr. Cottrell said. “So that’s why we need to make sure all of the samples that we’re testing are free of mold and microtoxins [that patients can't see unless] they have a microscope and they know what they’re looking for.”

Some marijuana contains pesticides and other chemicals that can be particularly harmful for people with weak immune systems, but not all labs test for these toxins.

The American Medical Association has become more vocal about medical marijuana over the years. At the height of the AIDS pandemic in the 1990s, medical marijuana was prescribed to HIV patients to help them regain their appetite and gain weight. Such prescription drugs as the pill Marinol (tetrahydrocannabinol) were standard for AIDS patients, and were also prescribed for cancer patients to prevent the nausea caused by chemotherapy.

Back in 2001, the AMA released the following statement regarding medical marijuana (http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=000088):

“The AMA urges the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to implement administrative procedures to facilitate grant applications and the conduct of well-designed clinical research into the medical utility of marijuana. This effort should include:

• Disseminating specific information for researchers on the development of safeguards for marijuana, clinical research protocols and the development of a model for informed consent on marijuana for institutional review board evaluation;
• Sufficient funding to support such clinical research and access for qualified investigators to adequate supplies of marijuana for clinical research purposes;
• Confirming that marijuana of various and consistent strengths and/or placebo will be supplied by the National Institute on Drug Abuse to investigators registered with the Drug Enforcement Agency who are conducting bona fide clinical research studies that receive Food and Drug Administration approval, regardless of whether or not the NIH is the primary source of grant support.”

In 2009, the AMA revised its policy and issued the following statement, “Our AMA urges that marijuana’s status as a federal Schedule I controlled substance be reviewed with the goal of facilitating the conduct of clinical research and development of cannabinoid-based medicines, and alternate delivery methods. This should not be viewed as an endorsement of state-based medical cannabis programs, the legalization of marijuana, or that scientific evidence on the therapeutic use of cannabis meets the current standards for a prescription drug product.”

The American College of Physicians (ACP) had many positive things to say about medical marijuana in its article “Supporting Research into the Therapeutic Role of Marijuana” (www.acpoline.org) back in 2008.

Even six years ago, ACP was for decriminalizing the use of marijuana.

“ACP urges review of marijuana’s status as a schedule I controlled substance and its reclassification into a more appropriate schedule, given the scientific evidence regarding marijuana’s safety and efficacy in some clinical conditions,” the article said. “ACP strongly supports exemption from federal criminal prosecution; civil liability; or professional sanctioning, such as loss of licensure or credentialing, for physicians who prescribe or dispense medical marijuana in accordance with state law.

Similarly, ACP strongly urges protection from criminal or civil penalties for patients who use medical marijuana as permitted under state laws.”

Disadvantages of Medical Marijuana

The quality of medical marijuana is just one problem. The SurvivalDoctor.com lists numerous complications (http://www.thesurvivaldoctor.com/2013/02/14/medical-marijuana-pros-and-cons-doctors-debate-opinions/):

“The FDA announced in 2006 there were “No sound scientific studies” that supported the use of medical marijuana. Why is there any debate? Any physician who prescribed a drug unapproved by the FDA would lose his or her license. Why is this one drug above the law? The state of California is knowingly violating federal law by allowing the use of “medical marijuana.”

“Long-term marijuana use leads to structural changes in the brain. One study showed hippocampal volume in cannabis users was inversely correlated with cumulative exposure to the drug in the left, but not right, hemisphere—a finding that suggests “the left hippocampus may be particularly vulnerable to the effects of cannabis exposure and may be more closely related to the emergence of psychotic symptoms.”

Atrial fibrillation should be included in the cardiovascular complications of marijuana smoking. Physicians should be aware of this particular association and carefully investigate patients with marijuana-related palpitations, dizziness or fainting. On the other hand, whenever a young patient without predisposing factors develops atrial fibrillation, the possibility of marijuana smoking should be examined as a potential cause. Although the exact clinical impact of this association is not clear, yet its incidence in the general population is probably underestimated.

On January 8, 2014, the news wire service Reuters published a story about the complications of medical marijuana legalization, “New York’s Medical Marijuana Law Excludes Some Who Seek the Drug” (http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/08/us-usa-marijuana-newyork-idUSBREA070TM20140108).

Reuters mentioned how Governor Cuomo’s executive order legalizing medical marijuana is too limited for some “It will remain illegal to grow marijuana or to import specialized plants from other states,” reporter Edith Honan wrote. “The order limits the number of hospitals that can dispense marijuana and allows its use only to treat diseases such as cancer and glaucoma, according to several people briefed on the plan.”

The story explored how certain strains of medical marijuana, specifically kinds that help children with seizures, are not legal in New York under Governor Cuomo’s law.

Economic Impact

The Huffington Post listed the many economic advantages of legalizing medical marijuana in the story “14 Ways Marijuana Legalization Could Boost the Economy” (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/07/marijuana-economy-14-reasons_n_2089107.html).

Some of the surprising monetary benefits include:

• $13.7 billion saved on prohibition enforcement costs
• Estimated $500 million in tax revenue for Washington State
• Estimated $60 million saved by Colorado legalization
• Legalization could reduce marijuana prices
• Huge prison cost savings (for prisoners on marijuana-related charges)
• Marijuana prohibition costs taxpayers $41.8 billion a year
• California marijuana crop worth $14 billion a year
• Illegal marijuana a $36 billion a year industry
• Oakland , CA raised more than $1 million in marijuana tax revenue in 2011
• Colorado pulls in $5 million from pot sales tax
• Legal marijuana could be $100 billion industry

Facebook Twitter Email Pinterest Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr

 

2 Responses

  1. marissa

    All over the country there has been debates about medical marijuana, whether or not marijuana is a good thing or if it is harmful. The people who are against medical marijuana believe that there are plenty of legal drugs that make the use of medical marijuana unnecessary, they also believe that marijuana can be addictive and lead to more hard core drug use. They also believe that marijuana use can lead to injuries of the lungs and immune system, interferes with fertility, impairs driving, balance and coordination and can potentially cause hallucinations and withdrawal symptoms (“Medical Marijuana ProCon”, 2014). Other reasons for people being against marijuana is that there can be changes in the brain and cardiovascular complications after long term use. The last big reason is that 50 to 70 percent more carcinogens than tobacco. (“Medical Marijuana”, 2014). Even though there are many negatives against medical marijuana, there are still many pros to it. Marijuana has helped many people with many disease like glaucoma, HIV, cancer, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis and pain (“Medical Marijuana ProCon”, 2014). Marijuana helps with nausea in chemotherapy and AIDS patients and it also gives an analgesic affect in cancer patients to help increase effect of codeine without having to take more. Marijuana also helps with nausea and many more effects of diseases. I believe that medical marijuana is a good thing even though there are some negatives most do not happen unless marijuana is used for an extended period of time. During a time when my mother was very ill with terminal cancer my brother and I did research on the use of medical marijuana to help here through a tough time. Although she was completely against it and never tried it we believed that it would help her greatly, with her pain and to possible help slow down the growth of her lung tumors. The research showed that medical marijuana could work as an analgesic to decrease the amount of codeine she needed to use but work slightly better. She did not like how codeine made her feel so she never really used it which ment she was always in excrutiating pain. Still to this day we always wonder what might have happened if she would have tried it but we do believe it would have worked or at least made her more comfortable even though there are some negative aspects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


seven − = 2

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

© The UMHS Endeavour